Cite

Figure 1

Quantitative representation of reported negative and positive attributes for the observed applications.
Quantitative representation of reported negative and positive attributes for the observed applications.

Detected themes codes categories and codes in qualitative analysis of submitted student opinions.

Theme Category Codes
Professional suitability Nursing theory compatibility Follows the nursing process, Holistic, Universal, Supports nursing theory, Secure, Relatable to existing paper-based documentation
Flexibility Flexible for enabling free text, Flexible for allowing limited data documentation, Diverse nursing diagnosis creation, Individually fitted nursing care plan, Efficient compared to paper-based documentation,
Structured data representation Clear data organization, Colour coded problem documentation, Easy to use, Inhibits incompleteness of documented data, Supports patient progress tracking, Practical graphical representations, Clear patient data overview
Functionalities and design Non-user-friendly functionalities Does not automatically save data, Does not flag logical inconsistencies, Does not provide pre-structured elements of a nursing care plan, Unintuitive to use, Poor standardized languages integration, Poor overview of medical data
Poor visual design Monotonous colour scheme, Outdated visual design, Sharp edges, Small buttons, Small font
Time-consuming Does not provide pre-structured elements of a nursing care plan, Unintuitive to use, Overuse of manual typing
Improvements recommendations Functionalities enhancements Include images documentation, Improve interdisciplinary use, Formulate data to enable research, Include risk screening tools, Include notifications and warnings, Include standardized nursing languages
Ensure user training Provide nursing process training, Provide user training

Comparison of survey results for the observed aspects of application use.

Application usability aspect Cronbach’s alpha Application M (Q1–Q3) Mann-Whitney U
Overall impressiona 0.942 AB 4.0 (3.0–5.0)7.0 (5.0–8.0) p<0.001
Learnabilitya 0.943 AB 5.0 (2.5–6.0)7.0 (5.0–8.0) p=0.002
Operabilitya 0.849 AB 5.0 (3.0–5.5)6.8 (5.5–8.0) p<0.001
Visual designa 0.906 AB 5.0 (3.8–6.5)7.0 (6.0–9.0) p<0.001
Usability for patient data documentationb 0.938 AB 3.0 (2.8–4.0)4.0 (4.0–4.5) p=0.002
Usability for nursing care plan formulationb 0.950 AB 3.0 (2.6–4.0)4.0 (4.0–5.0) p=0.001
Satisfaction with formulated nursing care planb 0.948 AB 3.0 (3.0–4.0)4.0 (3.5–4.0) p=0.015
eISSN:
1854-2476
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Hygiene and Environmental Medicine