[Anderson, Joel. 2009. Autonomy Gaps as a Social Pathology: Ideologiekritik Beyond Paternalism. Pp. 433–453 in Sozialphilosophie und Kritik, edited by Rainer Forst, Martin Hartmann, Rahel Jaeggi, and Martin Saar. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumberg, Ben. 2016. The Stigma of Claiming Benefits: A Quantitative Study. Journal of Social Policy 45(2): 181–199.10.1017/S0047279415000525]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumberg Geiger, Ben. 2017. Benefits Conditionality for Disabled People: Stylised Facts from a Review of International Evidence and Practice. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 25(2): 107–128.10.1332/175982717X14939739331010]Search in Google Scholar
[Béal, Arnaud, Nikos Kalampalikis, Nicolas Fieulaine, and Valérie Haas. 2014. Expériences de justice et représentations sociales : l’exemple du non-recours aux droits. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 103(3): 549–573.10.3917/cips.103.0549]Search in Google Scholar
[Berrat, Brigitte. 2014. Pourquoi en vient-on à renoncer à ses droits sociaux ? Le cas du non-recours aux droits et dispositifs liés au handicap. Les Politiques Sociales 3–4: 70–80.10.3917/lps.143.0070]Search in Google Scholar
[Berrat, Brigitte, Marcel Jaeger, and Michel Lallement. 2011. Le non recours aux droits et dispositifs liés au handicap. « Ne rien dire, c’est ne pas être handicapé ». Rapport de recherche. Paris : CNAM.10.3917/dunod.jaege.2011.01.0137]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonoli, Giuliano. 2013. The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669769.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Buß, Christopher, Bernhard Ebbinghaus, and Elias Naumann. 2017. Making Deservingness of the Unemployed Conditional: Changes in Public Support for the Conditionality of Unemployment Benefits. Pp. 167–85 in The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare: Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness, edited by Wim van Oorschot, Femke Roosma, Bart Meuleman, and Tim Reeskens. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781785367212.00022]Search in Google Scholar
[Chase, Elaine, and Robert Walker. 2012. The Co-Construction of Shame in the Context of Poverty: Beyond a Threat to the Social Bond. Sociology 47(4): 739–754.10.1177/0038038512453796]Search in Google Scholar
[Craig, Peter, and Matthew Greenslade. 1998. First Findings from the Disability Follow-Up to the Family Resources Survey: Research Summary No. 5. London: Analytical Services Division, Department of Social Security.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dubois, Vincent, and Marion Lieutaud. 2020. La « fraude sociale » en questions. La naturalisation d’une thématique politique au prisme des questions à l’Assemblée nationale (1986–2017). Revue française de science politique 70(3) : 341–371.10.3917/rfsp.703.0341]Search in Google Scholar
[Ervik, Rune, Nanna Kildal, and Even Nilssen (eds.). 2016. New Contractualism in European Welfare State Policies. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315597911]Search in Google Scholar
[Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.10.1177/095892879100100108]Search in Google Scholar
[Garthwaite, Kayleigh. 2014. Fear of the Brown Envelope: Exploring Welfare Reform with Long-Term Sickness Benefits Recipients. Social Policy & Administration 48(7): 782–798.10.1111/spol.12049]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodin, Robert E. 1998. Social Welfare as a Collective Social Responsibility. Pp. 97–195 in Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility, edited by David Schmidtz and Robert E. Goodin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grees, Nadja. 2019. Changing Swedish Sickness Insurance. Policies, Institutions and Outcomes. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, 175. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halpern, Janice, and Jerry Hausman. 1986. Choice Under Uncertainty: A Model of Applications for the Social Security Disability Insurance Program. Journal of Public Economics 31(2): 131–161.10.1016/0047-2727(86)90015-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamel, Marie-Pierre, and Philippe Warin. 2010. Non-recours (Non-take up). Pp. 383–390 in Dictionnaire des politiques publiques, edited by Laurie Boussaguet. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.10.3917/scpo.bouss.2010.01.0383]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernanz, Virginia, Franck Malherbet, and Michele Pellizzari. 2004. Take-Up of Welfare Benefits in OECD Countries: A Review of the Evidence. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hobson, Barbara. (ed.) 2014. Worklife Balance: The Agency and Capabilities Gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681136.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambrige, MA: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerr, Scott. 1982. Deciding About Supplementary Pensions: A Provisional Model. Journal of Social Policy 11(4): 505–517.10.1017/S0047279400022558]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerr, Scott. 1983. Making Ends Meet: An Investigation into the Non-Claiming of Supplementary Pensions. London: Bedford Square Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucas, Barbara, Catherine Ludwig, Jérôme Chapuis, Jenny Maggi and Eric Crettaz. 2019. Le non-recours aux prestations sociales à Genève. Quelles adaptations de la protection sociale aux attentes des familles en situation de précarité ? Rapport de recherche. Genève : Haute Ecole de Travail Social et Haute Ecole de Santé (HES-SO\\Genève).]Search in Google Scholar
[Marshall, Thomas H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maudinet, Marc. 2003. Access to Social Rights for People with Disabilities in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moffitt, Robert. 1983. An Economie Model of Welfare Stigma. American Economie Review 75 : 1023–1035.]Search in Google Scholar
[ODENORE. 2012. L’envers de la « fraude sociale ». Le scandale du non-recours aux droits sociaux. Paris : La Découverte.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2006. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. Norway, Poland and Switzerland. (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OFAS. 2018. Statistique de l’AI 2018. Berne : OFAS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Revillard, Anne. 2018. Vulnerable Rights: The Incomplete Realization of Disability Social Rights in France. Social Sciences 88(7), doi:10.3390/socsci7060088.10.3390/socsci7060088]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenstein, Emilie. 2012. L’activation et ses abus de langage : le cas de l’assurance-invalidité. Revue suisse de travail social 13(2) : 38–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenstein, Emilie. 2018. Activer les publics vulnérables ? Le cas de l’Assurance-invalidité. Thèse en Sciences de la société, mention Sociologie, Genève : UNIGE.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenstein, Emilie, and Jean-Michel Bonvin. 2020. Paradoxes of Universalism: The Case of the Swiss Disability Insurance. Social Inclusion 8(1): 168–177.10.17645/si.v8i1.2499]Search in Google Scholar
[Sen, Amartya K. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spicker, Paul. 1984. Stigma and Social Welfare. London: Croom Helm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spicker, Paul. 2017. Take-up of Benefits: Lessons from the UK. Pp. 37–52 in Armoede en ineffectiviteit van rechten. Non-take-up van rechten / Pauvreté et ineffectivité des droits. Non-recours aux droits, edited by Bernard Nicolas et alii, Brussels: Die Keure/La Charte.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swiss Federal Council. 2005. Message concernant la modification de la loi fédérale sur l’assurance-invalidité (5e révision de l’AI). Bern: Swiss Federal Council.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Berkel, Rik and Ben Valkenburg (eds.). 2007. Making it Personal: Individualising Activation Services in the EU. Bristol: Policy Press.10.46692/9781847422316]Search in Google Scholar
[van Oorschot, Wim. 1991. Non-Take-Up of Social Security Benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 1(1): 15–30.10.1177/095892879100100103]Search in Google Scholar
[van Oorschot, Wim. 1995. Realising Rights: A Multi-level Approach to Non-take-up of Means-tested Benefits. Aldershot: Avebury.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Oorschot, Wim. 1998. From Solidarity to Selectivity: The Reconstruction of the Dutch Social Security System 1980–2000. Social Policy Review 10: 183–202.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Oorschot, Wim, and Bjørn Hvinden. 2001. Introduction: Towards Convergence? Disability Policies in Europe. Pp. 3–11 in Disability Policies in European Countries, edited by Wim van Oorschot and Bjørn Hvinden. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warin, Philippe. 2006. L’accès aux droits sociaux. Grenoble : Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warin, Philippe. 2016. Le non-recours aux politiques sociales. Grenoble : Presses universitaires de Grenoble.10.3917/pug.warin.2017.01]Search in Google Scholar
[Warin, Philippe. 2018. What Non-Demand Demands? On the Non-Take-Up of Social Welfare. Books and Ideas. Paris: Collège de France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warin, Philippe and Barbara Lucas. 2020. Non-Take-Up: A Critical Analysis Category. ODENORE Working Paper 26(2).]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, Sharon. 2016. Conceptualising the Active Welfare Subject: Welfare Reform in Discourse, Policy and Lived Experience. Policy and Politics 44(2): 235–252.10.1332/030557314X13904856745154]Search in Google Scholar