The Duhem-Quine Thesis Reconsidered

Achinstein, P. (1998). Crucial experiments. In E. Craig (Ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Taylor and Francis. Retrieved 20 May. 2020, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/crucial-experiments/v-1.Search in Google Scholar

Ariew, R. (1984). The Duhem Thesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35(4), 313–325.10.1093/bjps/35.4.313Search in Google Scholar

Ariew, R. and Barker, P. (1990). Introduction (Piere Duhem: Historian and Philosopher of Science). Synthese, 83(2), 179–182.10.1007/BF00413754Search in Google Scholar

Bacon, F. (1620/1994). Novum Organum, P. Urbach and J. Gibson (trans.). La Salle, IL: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Carrier, M. (2011). Underdetermination as an Epistemological Test Tube: Expounding Hidden Values of the Scientific Community. Synthese, 180(2), 189–204.10.1007/s11229-009-9597-6Search in Google Scholar

Curd, M. and Cover, J. A (1998). Commentary (The Duhem-Quine Thesis and Underdetermination). In M. Curd and J. A. Cover (Eds.), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (pp. 354–408). New York–London: Norton and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Duhem, P. (1906/1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, P. P. Wiener (trans.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691233857Search in Google Scholar

Duhem, P. (1915/1991). German Science, J. Lyon (trans.). La Salle, IL: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Fairweather, A. (2012). Duhem-Quine Virtue Epistemology. Synthese, 187(2), 673–692.10.1007/s11229-010-9868-2Search in Google Scholar

Giannoni, C. (1967/1976). Quine, Grünbaum, and the Duhemian Thesis. In S. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 162–175). Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_11Search in Google Scholar

Gillies, D. (1993). Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes. Oxford–Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. (1960/1976). The Duhemian Argument. In S. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 116–131). Dordrecht–Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_7Search in Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. (1971/1976). Is it never Possible to Falsify a Hypothesis Irrevocably?. In S. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 260–288). Dordrecht–Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_15Search in Google Scholar

Harding, S. G. (1976). Introduction. In S. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. ix–xxi). Dordrecht–Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0Search in Google Scholar

Hesse, M. (1970/1976). Duhem, Quine and a New Empiricism. In S. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 184–204). Dordrecht–Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_13Search in Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. (2010). Duhem’s good sense as a guide to theory choice. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(1), 58–64.10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. and Paternotte, C. (2013). Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus. Erkenntnis, 78(5), 1109–1132.10.1007/s10670-012-9390-7Search in Google Scholar

Jaki, S. L. (1984). Uneasy Genius: The Life and Work of Pierre Duhem. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Search in Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (1965/1976). Grünbaum on ‘The Duhemian Argument’. In S. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 155–161). Dordrecht–Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_10Search in Google Scholar

Stump, D. (2007). Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 18(1), 149–159.10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.010Search in Google Scholar

Szalek, P. (2010). Does Virtue Ethics Really Exclude Duty Ethics?, International Philosophical Quarterly, 50 (3), 2010, 351–361.10.5840/ipq201050352Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43.10.2307/2181906Search in Google Scholar

Vuillemin, J. (1979). On Duhem’s and Quine’s Theses. Grazer Philosophishe Studien, 9(1), 69–96.10.1163/18756735-00901006Search in Google Scholar

Weber, M. (2009). The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Duhem’s Problems and Inference to the Best Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(1), 19–49.10.1093/bjps/axn040Search in Google Scholar

Wedeking, G. (1969/1976). Duhem, Quine and Grünbaum on Falsification. In S. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 176–183). Dordrecht–Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_12Search in Google Scholar

Weinert, F. (1995). The Duhem-Quine Thesis Revisited. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 9(2), 147–156.10.1080/02698599508573514Search in Google Scholar