<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Cambridge University Press’s vast project to produce authoritative new editions of the literary works of Joseph Conrad is now well advanced; but the project is flawed. I maintain that this is the <italic>Titanic</italic> of editions: big, costly, important, and disastrous. I specify “the literary works”, because I am not concerned with the admirable volumes of Conrad’s letters.The industrious Cambridge editors have done excellent work in correcting longstanding errors and in bringing to light much textual material which was previously lost. The edition is therefore indispensable. The editors have, however, deleted much house styling and correction: “successive layers of non-authorial intervention affecting wording and ‘accidentals’ – punctuation, spelling and word-division”. The result of the Cambridge editorial procedures is a Conradian prose which is often impoverished and is sometimes even ungrammatical and uncouth. In removing much punctuation, the editors have often removed logical clarity and rhetorical effectiveness.In this essay, therefore, I use a sequence of comparisons to demonstrate the presence of a pattern of flaws. The sequences are taken from <italic>Notes on Life and Letters</italic>, ’<italic>Twixt Land and Sea</italic> / <italic>Tales</italic>, <italic>Last Essays</italic>, <italic>Lord Jim</italic>, and <italic>The Nigger of the “Narcissus”</italic>. I compare extracts from the Cambridge texts with extracts taken from other editions.</abstract>

Cambridge University Press’s vast project to produce authoritative new editions of the literary works of Joseph Conrad is now well advanced; but the project is flawed. I maintain that this is the Titanic of editions: big, costly, important, and disastrous. I specify “the literary works”, because I am not concerned with the admirable volumes of Conrad’s letters.The industrious Cambridge editors have done excellent work in correcting longstanding errors and in bringing to light much textual material which was previously lost. The edition is therefore indispensable. The editors have, however, deleted much house styling and correction: “successive layers of non-authorial intervention affecting wording and ‘accidentals’ – punctuation, spelling and word-division”. The result of the Cambridge editorial procedures is a Conradian prose which is often impoverished and is sometimes even ungrammatical and uncouth. In removing much punctuation, the editors have often removed logical clarity and rhetorical effectiveness.In this essay, therefore, I use a sequence of comparisons to demonstrate the presence of a pattern of flaws. The sequences are taken from Notes on Life and Letters, ’Twixt Land and Sea / Tales, Last Essays, Lord Jim, and The Nigger of the “Narcissus”. I compare extracts from the Cambridge texts with extracts taken from other editions.

The <italic>Titanic</italic> Series: Reflections on Cambridge University Press’s Edition of the Literary Works of Joseph Conrad

Emeritus Professor of English, University of Sussex

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The  Series: Reflections on Cambridge University Press’s Edition of the Literary Works of Joseph Conrad

Cambridge University Press’s vast project to produce authoritative new editions of the literary works of Joseph Conrad is now well advanced; but the project is...

The Titanic Series: Reflections on Cambridge University Press’s Edition of the Literary Works of Joseph Conrad

Published Online: Jul 30, 2020

Page range: 179 - 198

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0009

Keywords
Cambridge University Press, Joseph Conrad, editions, editorial criteria, house styling, logical clarity, rhetorical effectiveness

© 2019 Cedric Watts, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The Titanic Series: Reflections on Cambridge University Press’s Edition of the Literary Works of Joseph Conrad

Published Online: Jul 30, 2020

Page range: 179 - 198

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0009

KeywordsCambridge University Press, Joseph Conrad, editions, editorial criteria, house styling, logical clarity, rhetorical effectiveness

© 2019 Cedric Watts, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Keywords
Cambridge University Press, Joseph Conrad, editions, editorial criteria, house styling, logical clarity, rhetorical effectiveness