A robust method for haploid sugar beet in vitro proliferation and hyperhydricity reduction

Aflaki F., Pazuki A., Gürel S., Stevanato S., Bıancardı E., G ürel E ., 2017. Doubled haploid sugar beet: an integrated view of factors influencing the processes of gynogenesis and chromosome doubling. Int. Sugar. J. 119: 884-895.Search in Google Scholar

Arve L.E., Carvalho D.R., Olsen J.E., Torre S., 2014. ABA induces H2O2 production in guard cells, but does not close the stomata on Vicia faba leaves developed at high air humidity. Plant Signal Behav. 9: e29192.10.4161/psb.29192420356625763494Search in Google Scholar

Arve L.E., Kruse O.M.O., Tanino K.K., Olsen J.E., Futsæther C., Torre S., 2015. Growth in continuous high air humidity increases the expression of CYP707A-genes and inhibits stomatal closure. Environ. Exp. Bot. 115: 11-19.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Bailey-Serres J., Fukao T., Gibbs D.J., Holdsworth M.J., Lee S.C., Licausi F., Perata P., Voesenek L.A., van Dongen J.T., 2012. Making sense of low oxygen sensing. Trends Plant Sci. 17: 129-138.10.1016/j.tplants.2011.12.00422280796Search in Google Scholar

Biancardi E., 2005. Objectives of sugar beet breeding. In: Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet. E. Biancard, L.G. Campbell, G.N. Skaracis and M. de Biaggi (Eds), Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield, NH, USA: 53-167.10.1201/9781482280296Search in Google Scholar

Bosemark N.O., 2006. Genetics and breeding. In: Sugar Beet. A.P. Draycott (Ed.), Blackwell Publishing, Harayana, India: 50-88.10.1002/9780470751114.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Carins Murphy M.R., Jordan G.J., Brodribb T.J., 2014. Acclimation to humidity modifies the link between leaf size and the density of veins and stomata. Plant Cell Environ. 37: 124-131.10.1111/pce.1213623682831Search in Google Scholar

Cohen J., 1988. “Small”, “medium” and “large” d values. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 24-27.Search in Google Scholar

Croux C., Catherine D., 2010. Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures. Stat. Methods Appl. 9: 497-515.10.1007/s10260-010-0142-zSearch in Google Scholar

Debergh I.C., Harbaoui Y., Lemeur R., 1981. Mass propagation of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus): Evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol. Plant. 53: 181-187.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb04130.xSearch in Google Scholar

Doležel J., Bartoš J.A.N., 2005. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann. Bot. 95: 99-110.10.1093/aob/mci005424671015596459Search in Google Scholar

Dwivedi S.L., Britt A.B., Tripathi L., Sharma S., Upadhyaya H.D., Ortiz R., 2015. Haploids: Constraints and opportunities in plant breeding. Biotechnol. Adv. 33: 812-829.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.07.00126165969Search in Google Scholar

Field A., 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage, London, UK. Search in Google Scholar

Gao H., Xia X., An L., Xin X., Liang Y., 2017. Reversion of hyperhydricity in pink (Dianthus chinensis L.) plantlets by AgNO3 and its associated mechanism during in vitro culture. Plant Sci. 254: 1-11.10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.10.00827964780Search in Google Scholar

Gürel E., Gürel S., Lemaux P.G., 2008. Biotechnology applications for sugar beet. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 27: 108-140. doi: 10.1080/07352680802202000Search in Google Scholar

Gürel S., Baloglu M.C., Gürel E., Oktem H.A., Yucel M., 2011. A two-stage pretreatment of seedlings improves adventitious shoot regeneration in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 106: 261. doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-9916-8Search in Google Scholar

Gürel S., Gürel E., 2013. In vitro regeneration of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). In: Bulbous Plants: Biotechnology. K.G. Ramawat and J.M. Merillon (Eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA: 113-151. doi: 10.1134/S1022795406020086Search in Google Scholar

Gürel S., Gürel E., Kaya Z., 2002. Protoplast fusion in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Turk. J. Biol. 26: 163--170. Howell D.C., 2012. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Ivanova M., van Staden J., 2010. Natural ventilation effectively reduces hyperhydricity in shoot cultures of Aloe polyphylla Schӧnland ex Pillans. Plant Growth Regul. 60: 143-150.10.1007/s10725-009-9430-8Search in Google Scholar

Ivanova M., van Staden J., 2011. Influence of gelling agent and cytokinins on the control of hyperhydricity in Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 104: 13-21.10.1007/s11240-010-9794-5Search in Google Scholar

Ivic-Haymes S.D., Smigocki A.C., 2005. Identification of highly regenerative plants within sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines for molecular breeding. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. - Plant 41: 483-488.10.1079/IVP2005666Search in Google Scholar

Kazan K., 2015. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 20: 219-229.10.1016/j.tplants.2015.02.00125731753Search in Google Scholar

Kevers C., Gaspar T.H., 1985. Vitrification of carnation in vitro: changes in ethylene production, ACC level and capacity to convert ACC to ethylene. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 4: 215-223.10.1007/BF00040195Search in Google Scholar

Kevers C., Franck R., Strasser R.J., Dommes J., Gaspar T., 2004. Hyperhydricity of micropropagated shoots: A typically stress-induced change of physiological state. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 77: 181-191.10.1023/B:TICU.0000016825.18930.e4Search in Google Scholar

Kikindonov G., Kikindonov T., Enchev S., 2016. Economical qualities of crosses between doubled haploid sugar beet lines. Agric. Sci. Technol. 8: 107-110.Search in Google Scholar

Klimek-Chodacka M., Baranski R., 2013. Comparison of haploid and doubled haploid sugar beet clones in their ability to micropropagate and regenerate. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 16: 1-10.10.2225/vol16-issue2-fulltext-3Search in Google Scholar

Liu M., Jiang F., Kong X., Tian J., Wu Z., Wu Z., 2017. Effects of multiple factors on hyperhydricity of Allium sativum L. Sci. Hortic. 217: 285-296. Mezei S., Kovacev L., Nagl N., 2006. Sugar beet micropropagation. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 20: 9-14.10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.010Search in Google Scholar

Mishutkina Y.V., Gaponenko A.K., 2006. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) morphogenesis in vitro: Effects of phytohormone type and concentration in the culture medium, type of explants, and plant genotype on shoot regeneration frequency. Russ. J. Genet. 42: 150.10.1134/S1022795406020086Search in Google Scholar

Murashige T., Skoog F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pazuki A., Aflaki F., Gürel E., Ergül A., Gürel S., 2017a. Gynogenesis induction in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) improved by 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and synergized with cold pretreatment. Sugar Tech. doi: 10.1007/s12355-017-0522-x.Search in Google Scholar

Pazuki A., Aflaki F., Gürel S., Ergül A., Gürel E., 2017b. Production of doubled haploids in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris): an efficient method by a multivariate experiment. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1313-5.Search in Google Scholar

Pospíšilová J., Synková H., Rulcová J., 2000. Cytokinins and water stress. Biol. Plant. 43: 321-328.10.1023/A:1026754404857Search in Google Scholar

Řezbová H., Mansoor M., Ondřej Š., Luboš S., 2016. The economic aspects of sugar beet production. Ver. Sem. Agr. XXV: 327-335.Search in Google Scholar

Rojas-Martínez L., Visser R.G., de Klerk G.J., 2010. The hyperhydricity syndrome: waterlogging of plant tissues as a major cause. Propag. Ornam. Plants 10: 169-175.Search in Google Scholar

Tian J., Cheng Y., Kong X., Liu M., Jiang F., Wu Z., 2017. Induction of reactive oxygen species and the potential role of NADPH oxidase in hyperhydricity of garlic plantlets in vitro. Protoplasma 254: 379-388.10.1007/s00709-016-0957-z26945990Search in Google Scholar

Tomaszewska-Sowa M., 2012. Effect of growth regulators and other components of culture medium on morphogenesis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in unfertilised ovule in vitro cultures. Acta Agrobot. 65: 91-100.10.5586/aa.2012.025Search in Google Scholar

Tomita K.I., Hiura S., Tamagake H., 2013. Evaluation of the potential for somatic embryogenesis in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines and improvement of regeneration efficiency. Plant Biotechnol. 30: 479-87.10.5511/plantbiotechnology.13.0816aSearch in Google Scholar

van den Dries N., Giannì S., Czerednik A., Krens F.A., de Klerk G.J.M., 2013. Flooding of the apoplast is a key factor in the development of hyperhydricity. J. Exp. Bot. 64: 5221-5230.10.1093/jxb/ert315383049624123249Search in Google Scholar

Weber J., Georgiev V., Haas C., Bley T., Pavlov A., 2010. Ploidy levels in Beta vulgaris (red beet) plant organs and in vitro systems. Eng. Life Sci. 10: 139-147.10.1002/elsc.200900021Search in Google Scholar

Wojtania A., Węgrzynowicz-Lesiak E., Dziurka M., Waligórski P., 2015. Sucrose and cytokinin interactions in relation to ethylene and abscisic acid production in the regulation of morphogenesis in Pelargonium × hortorum LH Bailey in vitro. Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 57: 62-69.10.1515/abcsb-2015-0005Search in Google Scholar

Xu W., Hou Y., Hung Y.S., Zou Y., 2013. A comparative analysis of Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau in normal and contaminated normal models. Signal Process. 93: 261-276.10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.08.005Search in Google Scholar