[
1. UN-Habitat. Global Report on Human Settlements: The Challenge of Slums. Nairobi: UN-Habitat, 2003. 345 p. [online]. UNhabitat [cited 10.12.2021]. https://unhabitat.org/the-challenge-of-slums-global-report-on-human-settlements-2003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. UNSD. SDG Goals. United Nations Statistics Division, 2022 [online]. United Nations [cited 10.12.2021]. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/goal-11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Al-Nammari, F. When the global impacts the local: Revisiting Talbiyeh Camp Improvement Project. Habitat International, vol. 44, 2014, pp. 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.00710.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Ababsa, M. The Evolution of Upgrading Policies in Amman. The Second International Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development. Amman, Jordan, July 2010. halshs-00467593.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Al Daly, J. I. Informal Settlements in Jordan: Upgrading Approaches Adopted and Lessons Learned, 1999 [online]. Housing Development and Management, Lund University [cited 12 20, 2011]. https://www.hdm.lth.se/fileadmin/hdm/alumni/papers/ad1999/ad1999-09.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Al-Nammari, F. Participatory urban upgrading and power: Lessons learnt from a pilot project in Jordan. Habitat International, vol. 39, 2013, pp. 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.00110.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Khawaja, M., Tiltnes, A. (eds.). On the Margins: Migration and living conditions of Palestinian Camp Refugees in Jordan. Oslo: FAFO Report 357, 2002. 214 p. [cited 10.12.2021]. https://www.fafo.no/media/com_netsukii/357.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Misselwitz, P., Hanafi, S. Testing a New Paradigm: UNRWA’s Camp Improvement Programme. Refugee Survey Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2–3, 2009, pp. 360–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdp03910.1093/rsq/hdp039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Arnstien, S. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 35, no. 4, 1969, pp. 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Pretty, J. Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture. World Development, vol. 23, no. 8, 1995, pp. 1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Vainio, T. Motivations, Results, and the Role of Technology in Participatory Design Research during 2000’s – a Review in the Field of Architecture and Urban Planning. Architecture and Urban Planning, vol. 11, no. 1, 2016, pp. 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/aup-2016-000210.1515/aup-2016-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Akmentiņa, L. Participatory Planning in Post-socialist Cities: A Case Study of Riga. Architecture and Urban Planning, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, pp. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-000410.2478/aup-2020-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. VeneKlasen, L., Miller, V., Clark, C., Reilly, M. Rights-based Approaches and Beyond: Challenges of Linking Rights and Participation. Working paper series, 235. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2004. 62 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Cleaver, F. Paradoxes of participation: Questioning Participatory Approaches to Development. Journal of International Development, 1999, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<597::AID-JID610>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<597::AID-JID610>3.0.CO;2-Q
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Guijt, I., Kaul Shah, M. Waking Up to Power, Conflict and Process. In: I. Guijt and M. Kaul Shah (eds.). The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development (International Development). London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1998, pp. 1–23.10.3362/9781780440309.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Beal, J., Todes, A. Gender and integrated area development projects: lessons from Cato Manor, Durban. Cities, vol. 21, no. 4, 2004, pp. 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.00310.1016/j.cities.2004.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Cornwall, A. Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development. World Development, vol. 31, no. 8, 2003, pp. 1325–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00086-X10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00086-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Balducci, A., Calvaresi, C. Participation and Leadership in Planning theory and Practices. In: M. Haus, H Heinelt and S. Murray (eds.). Urban Governance and Democracy, Leadership, and Community Involvement. London: Routledge, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020334095010.4324/9780203340950
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Mayoux, L. Beyond Naivet: Women, Gender Inequality and Participatory Development. Development and Change, vol. 26, no. 2, 1995, pp. 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00551.x10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00551.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Moser, C. O. N. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice, and Training. London: Routledge, 1994. 298 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Nikkhah, H., Abu-Samah, A. Development of ‘power within’ among the women: A road to empowerment. Asian Social Science, vol. 8, no. 1, 2012, pp. 39–46. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n1p3910.5539/ass.v8n1p39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Chu, C. Planning for Gender Inclusion: Gender-Inclusive Planning and Design Recommendations for Los Angeles Parks, 2022 [online]. Lewis Center: The Regional Policy Studies. UCLA [cited 05.06.2022]. https://www.lewis.ucla.edu/research/planning-for-gender-inclusion-gender-inclusive-planning-and-design-recommendations-for-los-angeles-parks/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Beebeejaun, Y. Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life. Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 39, no. 3, 2017, pp. 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.125552610.1080/07352166.2016.1255526
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Reeves, D., Parfitt, B., Archer, C. Gender and urban planning: Issues and trends. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2012. 57 p. [online 10.12.2021]. https://www.mypsup.org/library_files/downloads/Gender%20and%20Urban%20Planning%20-%20Issues%20and%20Trends.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Huedo, P., Ruá, M.J., Florez-Perez, L., Agost-Felip, R. Inclusion of Gender Views for The Evaluation and Mitigation of Urban Vulnerability: A Case Study in Castellón. Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 18, 2021, p. 10062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13181006210.3390/su131810062
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Christodoulou, C. Gender Mainstreaming Urban Planning and Design Processes in Greece. In: Inés Sánchez de Madariaga and Michael Neuman (eds). Engendering Cities: Designing Sustainable Urban Spaces for All. New York: Routledge, 2020, pp. 229–242.10.4324/9781351200912-13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Huning, S. From feminist critique to gender mainstreaming – and back? The case of German urban planning. Gender, Place & Culture, vol. 27, no. 7, 2020, pp. 944–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.161879610.1080/0966369X.2019.1618796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Kizika, V., Akmentiņa, L. Broadening Public Engagement in Spatial Planning through Digital Participatory Mapping: Experiences from Latvia. Architecture and Urban Planning, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, pp. 30–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2022-000410.2478/aup-2022-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Escalante, S. O., Valdivia, B. G. Planning from below: using feminist participatory methods to increase women’s participation in urban planning. Gender & Development, vol. 23, no. 1, 2015, pp. 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2015.101420610.1080/13552074.2015.1014206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Spain, D. What Happened to Gender Relations on the Way from Chicago to Los Angeles? In: Richard T. LeGates and Frederic Stout (eds). The City Reader. London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 222–231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Rendell, J., Penner, B., Borden, I. Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2003. 448 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Weisman, L. Discrimination by design: A feminist critique of the man-made environment. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1994. ISBN 0252063996
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Day, K. Feminist approaches to urban design. In: A. Loukaitou-Sideris T. Banerjee. (eds.). Companion to urban design. London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 150–161.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Insights into the socio-economic conditions of Palestinian refugees in Jordan, December 20, 2013 [online]. United Nations and works agency for Palestine refugees in the near East [cited 10.04.2022]. https://www.unrwa.org/resources/reports/insights-socio-economic-conditions-palestinian-refugees-jordan
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Department of Palestinian Affairs. 60 Years Serving Refugee Camps. Amman: Department of Palestinian Affairs, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
