Decline in Female Fertility After 40 Years

1. Peters H. Intrauterine gonadal developement. Fertil Steril 1976;27:493-500.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)41829-7Search in Google Scholar

2. Holman DJ, Wood JW, Cambell KL. Age dependent decline of female fecundity is caused by early fetal loos. In Female Reproductive Aging. UK: Parthenon Publishing Group 2000; 123-36.Search in Google Scholar

3. Vaskivuo TE, Anttonen M, Herva R, Billing H, Dorland M, te Velde ER, Stenback F, Heikinheimo M & Tapanainen JS. Survival of human ovarian follicles from fetal to adult life: apoptosis, apoptosis-related proteins and transcription factor GATA-4. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:3421-9. DOI:10.1210/jcem.86.7.767910.1210/jcem.86.7.7679Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ & Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1342-6.129155710.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137570Search in Google Scholar

5. Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS, Piccinino LJ. Ferility, family planning and womens health: new data from the 1995. National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 1997; 23: 1-114.Search in Google Scholar

6. Polani PE & Crolla JA. A test of the production line hypothesis of mammalian oogenesis. Hum Genet 1991;88:64-70.10.1007/BF002049311959927Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Van Blerkom J, Antczak M & Schrader R. The developmental potential of the human oocite is related to the dissolved oxygen content of folikular fluid: association with vascular endothelial growth factor levels and perifollicular blood flow characteristics. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1047-55.10.1093/humrep/12.5.1047Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Volarcik K, Sheean L, Goldfarb J, Woods L, Abdul Karim FW and Hunt P. The meiotic competence of in vitro matured human oocytes is influenced by donor age: evidence that folliculogenesis is compromised in the reproducively aged ovary. Hum Reprod 1998;13:154-60.10.1093/humrep/13.1.154Search in Google Scholar

9. Keefe DL, Niven-Fairchild T, PowellS, Buradagunta S. Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid deletions in oocytes and reproductive aging in women. Fertil Steril 1995;64:577-83.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57796-67641914Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J, Fuchs B, Bruns M, et al. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)-reevaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:539-47.10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200669Search in Google Scholar

11. Chang MY, Chiang CH, Hsieh TT, Soong YK and Hsu KH. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1998;69:505-10.10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00557-8Search in Google Scholar

12. Babcová K, Ulcová-Gallová Z, Rumpík D, Micanová Z, Bibková K. Inhibin A and B levels in serum and follicular fluids of women with various reproductive failures undergoing in vitro fertilization. Ginekol Pol. 2015;86(10):726-30.10.17772/gp/5784426677580Search in Google Scholar

13. Goswami D, Conway SG. Premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:391–410. doi 10.1093/humupd/dmi01210.1093/humupd/dmi012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Steiner AZ, Pritchard D, Stanczyk FZ, Kesner JS, Meadows JW, Herring AH, Baird DD. Association Between Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve and Infertility Among Older Women of Reproductive Age. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1367-1376. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14588.10.1001/jama.2017.14588Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Van Rooij IA, Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Women older than 40 years of age and those with elevated FSH levels differ in poor response rate and embrio quality in in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 2003;79:482-8.10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04839-2Search in Google Scholar

16. Perez Mayorga M, Gromoll J, Behere HM, Gassner C, Simoni M. Ovarian response to FSH stimulation depends on the FSH receptor genotype. J clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3365-9. DOI:10.1210/jcem.85.9.678910.1210/jcem.85.9.6789Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Mohiyiddeen L, Newman WG, McBurney H, Mulugeta B, Roberts SA, Nardo LG. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian reserve markers. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(3):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.04010.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Argento C, Grisendi V, Casarini L, Volpe A, Simoni M. Polymorphisms in gonadotropin and gonadotropin receptor genes as markers of ovarian reserve and response in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(4):970-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2013.01.086.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.086Search in Google Scholar

19. Strowitzki, T., Germeyer, A., Popovici, R., and von Wolff, M. The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:617–630. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml03310.1093/humupd/dml033Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh TB, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, Haas J. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1301-05. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1190-910.1007/s10815-018-1190-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Baroni E, Ferrero S, Iacobelli M, et all. Implantation in patients over 40 and raising FSH levels-a review. Placenta 2003;24:34-8.10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00179-6Search in Google Scholar

22. Levi AJ, Drews MR, Bergh PA et al. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation does not adversely affect endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilisation cycles. Fertil Steril 2001;76:670-4.10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01988-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Jin XY, Zhao LJ, Luo DH, Liu L, Dai YD, Hu XX, Wang YY, Lin X, Hong F, Li TC, Zhang SY. Pinopode score around the time of implantation is predictive of successful implantation following frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(12):2394-2403. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex312.10.1093/humrep/dex31229040606Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Revel A. Defective endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2012;97(5):1028-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.039.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.03922542142Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Perez-Medina, T., Bajo-Arenas, J., Salazar, F., Redondo, T., Sanfrutos, L., Alvarez, P. et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20: 1632–1635. DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh82210.1093/humrep/deh82215760959Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Siristatidis C, Rigos I, Pergialiotis V, Karageorgiou V, Christoforidis N, Daskalakis G, Bettocchi S, Makrigiannakis A. Endometrial injury for patients with endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing medically assisted reproduction: current data and a protocol.Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2018;35(1). doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2018-004010.1515/hmbci-2018-004030144383Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Matsuzaki, S., Canis, M., Darcha, C., Pouly, J.L., and Mage, G. HOXA-10 expression in the mid-secretory endometrium of infertile patients with either endometriosis, uterine fibromas or unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 3180–3187. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep30610.1093/humrep/dep30619736237Search in Google Scholar

28. Yu, D., Wong, Y.M., Cheong, Y., Xia, E., and Li, T.C. Asherman syndrome–one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:759–779. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.09610.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.09618406834Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Lessey, B.A. Assessment of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:522–529.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.109521880273Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Lessey, B.A., Killam, A.P., Metzger, D.A., Haney, A.F., Greene, G.L., and McCarty, K.S. Jr. Immunohistochemical analysis of human uterine estrogen and progesterone receptors throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67:334–340. DOI:10.1210/jcem-67-2-33410.1210/jcem-67-2-3342455728Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Chen SL, Wu FR, Luo C, Chen X, Shi XY, Zheng HY. et al. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2010;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30.10.1186/1477-7827-8-30285169720334664Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Gleicher N, Vidali A, and Barad DH. Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium.Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2123. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.143.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.14321324451Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Mansour R, Tawab N, Kamal O, El-Faissal Y, Serour A, Aboulghar M et al. Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer significantly improves the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1370–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.04410.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.0442204766422047664Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34. Bagrie E. Ovarian reserve tests for predicting fertility outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: the International Systematic Collaboration of Ovarian Reserve Evaluation protocol for a systematic review of ovarian reserve test accuracy. BJOG 2006; 113(12):1472-80. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01068.x10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01068.x17176280Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35. Zebitay AG, Cetin O, Verit FF, Keskin S, Sakar MN, Karahuseyinoglu S, Ilhan G, Sahmay S. The role of ovarian reserve markers in prediction of clinical pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(4):492-497. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1049253.10.3109/01443615.2015.10492532842190226492218Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Coccia ME, Rizzello F. Ovarian reserve. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1127:27-30.10.1196/annals.1434.01118443326Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 12:685–718. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml034.10.1093/humupd/dml03416891297Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. La Marca A, Argento C, Sighinolfi G, Grisendi V, Carbone M, D’Ippolito G, Artenisio AC, Stabile G, Volpe A. Possibilities and limits of ovarian reserve testing in ART. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13(3):398-408.10.2174/13892011279936197221657996Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Amsiejiene A, Drasutiene G, Usoniene A, Tutkuviene J, Vilsinskaite S, Barskutyte L. The influence of age, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and anti-Mullerian hormone level on clinical pregnancy rates in ART. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(sup1):41-43. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1399692.10.1080/09513590.2017.139969229264991Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

40. Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton N, Craig LB. Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril 2011;95:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.00610.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.00620522327Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

41. Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, Griesinger G, Kelsey TW, La Marca A, Lambalk C, Mason H, Nelson SM, Visser JA, Wallace WH, Anderson RA. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20(3): 370-85. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt062.10.1093/humupd/dmt0622443086324430863Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

42. Hiedar Z, Bakhtiyari M, Foroozanfard F, Mirzamoradi M. Age-specific reference values and cut-off points for antimüllerian hormone in infertile women following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF. J Endocrinol Invest. 2018; 41(7):773-780. doi: 10.1007/s40618-017-0802-z.10.1007/s40618-017-0802-z2923504929235049Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

43. Jeppesen JV, Anderson RA, Kelsey TW, Christiansen SL, Kristensen SG, Jayaprakasan K, Raine-Fenning N, Campbell BK, Yding Andersen C. Which follicles make the most anti-Mullerian hormone in humans? Evidence for an abrupt decline in AMH production at the time of follicle selection. Mol Hum Reprod 2013;19:519-527. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat024.2356294410.1093/molehr/gat02423562944Search in Google Scholar

44. Robert KK Lee, Frank SY Wu, Ming-Huei Lin, Shyr-Yeu Lin, and Yuh-Ming Hwu. The predictability of serum anti-Müllerian level in IVF/ICSI outcomes for patients of advanced reproductive age. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:115. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-115.10.1186/1477-7827-9-115317545621843363Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

45. Sayadyan A, Totoyan E. OVARIAN RESERVE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF IVF IN WOMEN OF VARIOUS AGE GROUPS. Georgian Med News. 2017;268:67-72.Search in Google Scholar

46. Tolikas A, Tsakos E, Gerou S, Prapas Y, Loufopoulos A. Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarian response in stimulated (IVF and ICSI) cycles. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011; 14(4): 246-53. doi:10.3109/14647273.2011.608464.2208813010.3109/14647273.2011.60846422088130Search in Google Scholar

47. Bentzen JG, Forman JL, Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Larsen EC, Friis-Hansen L, Johannsen TH, Nyboe Andersen A. Ovarian reserve parameters: a comparison between users and non-users of hormonal contraception. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:612-619. doi: 10.1016/j. rbmo.2012.09.0012306974010.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.00123069740Search in Google Scholar

48. Deb S, Campbell BK, Pincott-Allen C, Clewes JS, Cumberpatch G, Raine-Fenning NJ. Quantifying effect of combined oral contraceptive pill on functional ovarian reserve as measured by serum anti-Müllerian hormone and small antral follicle count using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(5): 574-80. doi: 10.1002/uog.10114.10.1002/uog.1011421997961Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

49. Šorak M, Arsenijevic S, Loncar D, Đuric J, Živanovic A. Climen u terapiji perimenopauzalnih simptoma. Zbornik radova i sažetaka predavanja XV Jugoslovenski simpozijum o fertilitetu i sterilitetu 2002: 245-6.Search in Google Scholar

50. Broekmans FJ, de Ziegler D, Howles CM, Gougeon A, Trew G, Olivennes F. The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1044-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2009.04.040.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.04019589513Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

51. Usta T, Oral E. Is the measurement of anti-Müllerian hormone essential? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 24(3): 151-7. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283527dcf.10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283527dcf22487725Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

52. Lass A, Skull J, Mcveigh E, Margara R, Winston R. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 1997;12:294-297.10.1093/humrep/12.2.29490707149070714Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

53. Pavlik EJ, DePriest PD, Gallion HH, Ueland FR, Reedy MB, Kryscio RJ, et al. Ovarian volume related to age. Gynecol Oncol 2000;77:410–12.10.1006/gyno.2000.578310831351Search in Google Scholar

54. Steiner AZ, Pritchard D, Stanczyk FZ, Kesner JS, Meadows JW, Herring AH, Baird DD.Association Between Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve and Infertility Among Older Women of Reproductive Age. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1367-1376. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14588.10.1001/jama.2017.14588574425229049585Search in Google Scholar

55. Jirge PR. Poor ovarian reserve. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):63-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.183514.10.4103/0974-1208.183514491528827382229Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

56. De Koning CH, Popp-Snijders C, Schoemaker J, Lambalk CB. Elevated FSH concentrations in imminent ovarian failure are associated with higher FSH and LH pulse amplitude and response to GnRH. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1452–6.10.1093/humrep/15.7.1452Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

57. Barroso G, Oehninger S, Monzo A, Kolm P, Gibbons WE, Muasher SJ. High FSH.:LH ratio and low LH levels in basal cycle day 3: impact on follicular development and IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:499–505.10.1023/A:1016601110424Search in Google Scholar

58. Fanchin R, De Ziegler D, Olivennes F, Taieb J, Dzik A, Frydman R. Exogenous follicle stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test (EFORT): a simple and reliable screening test for detecting ‘poor responders’ in invitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1607–11.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138760Search in Google Scholar

59. Ranieri DM, Quinn F, Makhlouf A, Khadum I, Ghutmi W, Mcgarrigle H, Davies M, Serhal P. Simultaneous evaluation of basal follicle-stimulating hormone and 17 beta-estradiol response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue stimulation: an improved predictor of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 1998;70:227-33.10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00159-9Search in Google Scholar

60. Winslow KL, Toner JP, Brzyski RG, Oehninger SC, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist stimulation test—a sensitive predictor of performance in the flare-up in vitro fertilization cycle. Fertil Steril 1991;56:711–17.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54604-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

61. Ravhon A, Aurell R, Lawrie H, Margara R, Winston RM. The significance of delayed suppression using buserelin acetate and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a long protocol in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 2000;73:325–9.10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00521-XSearch in Google Scholar

62. Bonilla-Musoles F, Castillo JC, Caballero O, Pérez- Panades J, Bonilla F Jr, Dolz M, Osborne N. Predicting ovarian reserve and reproductive outcome using antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) in patients with previous assisted reproduction technique (ART) failure. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(1): 13-8.22675946Search in Google Scholar

63. Ciray HN, Ulug U, Tosun S, Erden HF, Bahceci M. Outcome of 1114 ICSI and embryo transfer cycles of women 40 years of age and over. RBM Online 2006:13(4);516-22.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60639-6Search in Google Scholar

64. Jansen RP. The effect of female age on the likelihood of a live birth from in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Medical Journal of Australia 2003:179;258-61.10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05190.xSearch in Google Scholar

65. Combelles CMH, Orasanu B, Ginsburg ES et al. Optimum number of embryos to transfer in women more than 40 years of ageundergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 2005:84;1637-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.07010.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.07016359957Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

66. Devroey P, Godoy H, Smitz I et al. Female age predicts embryonic implantation after ICSI- a case controlled study. Human Reproduction 1996:11;1324-7.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a0193808671448Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

67. Szamatowicz M, Grochowski D. Fertility and infertility in aging women. Journal of Gynaecological Endocrinology 1998:12;407-13.10.3109/09513599809012843Search in Google Scholar

68. Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005:10;436-41.1590144910.1016/S1472-6483(10)60818-8Search in Google Scholar

69. Alvaro Mercadal B, Rodríguez I, Arroyo G, Martínez F, Barri PN, Coroleu B. Characterization of a suboptimal IVF population and clinical outcome after two IVF cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(2):125-128. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.136951510.1080/09513590.2017.136951528868939Open DOISearch in Google Scholar