[
Andrews, C.J., Baptista, A.I., Patton, S.L.W., 2005. Grounded theory and multi-agent simulation for a small firm. (in) Agent-Based Simulation: From Modelling Methodologies to Real-World Applications, Terano T., Kita H., Kaneda T., Arai K., Deguchi H., eds., Springer, Tokio, Japan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Auksztol, J., 2008. Outsourcing Informatyczny w Teorii i Praktyce Zarządzania. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, Poland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Auth, G., Jokisch, O., Dürk, Ch., 2019. Revisiting automated project management in the digital age – a survey of AI approaches. eJournal of Applied Knowledge Management, 7(1), DOI: 10.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(1)27-3910.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(1)27-39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bendel, O., 2016. 300 Keywords Informationsethik: Grundwissen aus Computer-, Netz- und Neue-Medien-Ethik sowie Maschinenethik. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Best Practice Solutions, https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/prince2 (accessed 16.04.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradley, K., 2002. Podstawy Metodyki PRINCE II CRM S.A. Centrum Rozwiązań Menadżerskich, Warszawa, Poland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bukłaha, E., Juchniewicz, M., 2019. Kluczowe wyzwania i bariery oraz trendy w zarządzaniu projektami z punktu widzenia projektów realizowanych w Polsce. Przegląd Organizacji, 3 (950), 14-20.10.33141/po.2019.03.03
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cao, J.Q., Zhang, S.H., 2016. ITIL Incident Management Process Reengineering in Industry 4.0 Environments. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Informatics (AMEII 2016), 73, 1011-1016.10.2991/ameii-16.2016.193
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, S.I., 2004. ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support. Implications for Practice and Research, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czakon, W. (ed.), 2011. Podstawy Metodologii Badań w Naukach o Zarządzaniu, Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa, Poland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daly, A. et al., 2019. Artificial Intelligence, governance and ethics: global perspectives, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law Research, 2019(15), Hong Kong, China, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.341480510.2139/ssrn.3414805
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, J., Hoffert, J., Vanlandingham, E., 2016. A taxonomy of artificial intelligence approaches for adaptive distributed real-time embedded systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), DOI: 10.1109/EIT.2016.753524610.1109/EIT.2016.7535246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esteves J., Bohorquez V., 2007. An updated ERP systems annotated bibliography 2001–2005. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 1-59, DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.0191810.17705/1CAIS.01918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esteves, J., Pastor, J., 2006. Organizational and technological critical success factors behavior along 35 the ERP implementation phases, (in) 36 Enterprise Information Systems VI. Seruca, I., Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Felipe, J. (eds), Springer, Netherlands.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu (accessed 05.03.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., Welch, M., 2013. Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/embracing-digital-technology/ (accessed 28.03.2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaton, J., 2017. Rise of the project bots, Microsoft Project User Group (MPUG). https://www.mpug.com/articles/rise-project-bots/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groover, M.P., 2008. Automation, Production Systems, and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, third ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ITIL, https://www.itlibrary.org/ (accessed 16.04.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E., 2019. The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389-399, DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-210.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kotarba, M., 2018. Digital transformation of business models, Foundations of Management, 10, DOI: 10.2478/fman-2018-001110.2478/fman-2018-0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lahmann, M., 2018. AI will transform project management. Are you ready? PwC, https://www.pwc.ch/en/insights/risk/ai-will-transform-project-management-are-you-ready.html (accessed 13.09.2021)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larsson, S., Heintz, F., 2020. Transparency in Artificial Intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 9 (2), 1-16, DOI: 10.14763/2020.2.146910.14763/2020.2.1469
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, J., 2013. Industry 4.0 in Big Data environment. German Harting Magazine, 26, 8-10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leviathan, Y., Matias, Y., 2018. Google Duplex: an AI system for accomplishing real-world tasks over the phone. https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html (accessed 13.09.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maes, P., 1994. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 31-40.10.1145/176789.176792
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Metzinger, T., 2019. Ethics washing made in Europe. Der Tagesspiegel, https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-guidelines-ethics-washing-made-in-europe/24195496.html (accessed 15.09.2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Microsoft, https://www.microsoft.com (accessed 13.09.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, T.H., Sherif, J.S., Newby, M. 2007. Strategies for successful CRM implementation. Information Management & Computer Security, 15(2), 102-115, DOI: 10.1108/0968522071074800110.1108/09685220710748001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nimavat, K., Champaneria, T., 2017. Chatbots: an overview. Types, architecture, tools and future possibilities. IJSRD – International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 5(7), 1019-1024.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., Murray, R.M., 2007. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1), 215-233.10.1109/JPROC.2006.887293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Project Management Institute, 2008. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Fourth edition, Newtown Square.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rowley, J., 2007. The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180.10.1177/0165551506070706
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruchi, S., Srinath, P., 2018. Big Data Platform for Enterprise Project Management Digitization Using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICECA.2018.8474799
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., 2010. Artificial intelligence – A Modern Approach. third ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SAP, http://www.sap.com, (accessed 13.09.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schoen, M., 2017. Hype cycle for project and portfolio management, https://www.gartner.com/doc/3772090/hype-cycle-project-portfolio-management, (accessed 13.09.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skorek, N., Trojanowski, M., Wilczak, A., 2010. Studium przypadku w nauczaniu marketingu. (in) Marketing w Realiach Współczesnego Rynku. Strategie i Działania Marketingowe, PWE, Warszawa, Poland, 549-556.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spałek S., 2017, Zarządzanie projektami w erze przemysłu 4.0. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 9, 106-112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sullivan III, M., 2016. Statistics: Informed Decisions Using Data, fifth ed., Person, Harlow, England, ISBN-10: 0134135377.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanhoucke, M., 2012. Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling: Baseline Scheduling. Risk Analysis and Project Control, second ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany.10.1007/978-3-642-25175-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachnik, B., 2016. Wdrażanie Systemów Informatycznych Wspomagających Zarządzanie, PWE, Warszawa, Poland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachnik, B. 2020a. Możliwość wykorzystywania botów zintergrowanych z Dynamics 365 BC/NAV, Alna, https://alna.pl/pl/blog/mozliwosc-wykorzystania-botow-zintegrowanych-z-dynamics-365-bc-nav (accessed 13.09.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachnik, B., 2020b. Luka Informacyjna w Przedsięwzięciach Informatycznych. Problemy i Rozwiązania, PWE, Warszawa, Poland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, W.E., Marchau, V.A.W.J., Swanson, D., 2010. Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: Introduction to section 2. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Elsevier, 77, 917-923.10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziółkowski A., Orłowski C., 2007, Concept of the agent system for the information technology evaluation. Information systems architecture and technology: information systems and computer communication networks, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław, Poland, 61-69.
]Search in Google Scholar
| 12. Feb. 2022